Thursday, February 14, 2013

WV State Board of Education Reviews Webster's School Budget Deficit Reduction Plan

At its meeting Wednesday evening in Charleston, the West Virginia State Board of Education approved the Webster County Board's plan to address the county's school budget deficit now being discussed locally as one of the reasons in support of Superintendent Martha Dean's school consolidation plan.

Eight county Board of Education budgets were reviewed by the State Board. Five of those budgets were considered critical because of their large budget deficits. Three budgets were termed "casual," including Webster County. When a county board has more than a "casual" deficit and action is not taken to correct it, the State Board can take over the county school system. Since Webster does not have more than a casual deficit, a State take over is not allowed under the law. 

West Virginia law defines a "casual" deficit as one that is "not more than three percent of the approved levy estimate or a deficit that is nonrecurring from year to year." According to the figures presented to the State Board, Webster's most recent deficit is both less than three percent of the levy estimate and is nonrecurring (Webster County's Board of Education budget is in excess of $17.7 million in the last fiscal year). Here are the Webster County budget figures reviewed by the State Board: 
  • June 30, 2008, budget deficit of $196,533.00
  • June 30, 2009, budget surplus of $446.278.00
  • June 30, 2010, budget surplus of $518.842.00
  • June 30, 2011, budget surplus of $101,404.00
  • June 30, 2012, budget deficit of $58,980.00

Of the eight county budgets reviewed by the State Board, Webster's $59,980.00 budget deficit was the second lowest deficit (Pendleton County had a $19,793.00 deficit).

Webster's deficit of $59,980.00 as presented to the State Board was corrected to be only $1,897.99, according to a letter presented at the State Board's meeting Wednesday. That letter, which Save Our School committee leader LaCosta Westfall read at Tuesday's Webster County Board meeting, was authored by Superintendent Dean on January 9, 2013.

In her letter, Dr. Dean states that "as per your request, I am submitting the following corrective action plan to address the deficit in unrestricted fund balances in Webster County School's General Current Expense fund as of June 30, 2012. Since that report came final, we received e-rate funds due us for FY'12 in the amount of $58,082.01. This receipt reduces the deficit for Webster County to $1,897.99."

Dr. Dean proposed four strategies in her letter to address the small deficit to ensure that the county does not have a deficit in the future:
  1. Request funds due us in a more timely manner;
  2. Address energy-saving strategies in all our schools;
  3. Employ only those employees paid for through the State Funding formula; and
  4. Postpone costly repair items until funds are readily available.
Dr. Dean concludes her letter by stating that "I trust these strategies employed by the Webster County Board of Education will be sufficient to resolve the deficit notes at the end of FY'12."

As Westfall noted at the Tuesday meeting, no where in her letter (that was approved by the State Board) does Dr. Dean mention school consolidation as a strategy necessary to address the $1,897.99 budget deficit. 

Before the Webster Board elected to take no action on Dr. Dean's consolidation plan at Tuesday's meeting, Westfall questioned why the Board would even consider closing the Diana Elementary School or any other school in the County given the very small budget deficit. Westfall even offered to cash in part of her retirement plan to come up with the "$2,000.00 to stop this [consolidation plan]."

Previously, the Commentator reported that the Webster Board's deficit to be significantly greater. The Commentator has in its possession the "Annual Financial Statements of the Webster County Board of Education as of and for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012." That Statement was signed under oath by Board President Paula Mae Tanner and Dr. Dean on September 25, 2012. That Statement lists revenues and expenditures, and concludes with a fund balance ending in a deficit of $288,608.00.

The Commentator along with the editor of the Webster Echo interviewed Dr. Dean in December, 2012, and Dr. Dean said in the interview that the county's school budget deficit was approximately $300,000.00, which is consistent with the sworn Financial Statement. Dr. Dean listed that larger budget deficit as one of the main reasons for the school consolidation plan.

Now, for whatever reason, the deficit stands at a paltry $1,897.99. Many are seriously questioning the need for a school consolidation plan in light of these revised figures, particularly considering that the State Board just approved Dr. Dean's plan which does not mention school consolidation as a strategy to address the now relatively insignificant budget deficit.


Link to West Virginia State Board of Education minutes discussing budget deficits of all eight counties (including, at very end, the letter from Dr. Dean to the Office of School Finance):

Link to the February 13, 2013 Charleston Gazette article mentioning Webster County's school budget:

Link to law defining budget deficit as "casual":

Link to law stating when a State take over can occur if budget deficit is more than "casual":

Link to our prior interview with Dr. Dean:

7 comments:

  1. From the conflicting Dollar Amounts, it appears to be necessary to call for an independent AUDIT of the
    Webster County BOE. For the life of me, I can't understand why a "School of Excellence" would be closed. My other thought about the Board Members is that they are acting as employees of Martha Dean, when in fact she is their employee. I hope the current Board Members remember that election time will be here before thy know it. Rest assured the voter and taxpayers WILL NOT FORGET!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am shocked that so many teachers had to be laid off during this "crisis." I am calling it a crisis because it is the most unfair and dishonest situation I have ever heard of. With just under a 2,000 dollar deficit why would any classroom teacher need to be cut? We are going to lose several fantastic teachers because they will have to leave in order to find work. How could the board vote on these layoffs for no reason? What have you done to our schools and our county? The people of Webster county have been misled! The board members either have turned a blind eye or were misled too. This now needs to be a problem for the state. They need to come in and put our teachers back where they belong and put out the real problem! There is no real threat of our county being in such financial turmoil. In fact it looks like our county can afford its five schools and should not have to consolidate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, Mr. Commentator, for continuing to keep the public informed of the facts in this closure/consolidation dilemma. Your blog has kept everyone informed and brought forth much needed awareness without bias. Hopefully, eyes will continue to be opened to the underhandedness that continues to take place.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Paula and Martha lied to us. Is there anything we as voters can do to get Paula removed from her seat on the board before the next election. Mrs Dean also needs to be replaced.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Give it a rest people! The rest of the county's schools might have a chance at being a "School of Excellence" if so much money was not expended on that school. Other larger schools were closed in the 1960's 1970's. We have been suffering ever since. We used to have schools all over the county. Teachers are having to be paid extra for the number of students in their classrooms while they have ten or less students in their class. What a waste of money. Change is imminent. You ain't seen nothing yet. WV will eventually go to regional boards of education instead of the 55 county system currently in place. Then you will really have something to complain about! If that school isn't closed now, it certainly will be when the governor gets finished with his education audit. Read the paper.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Given the attitude of the Board President, a regional Board might not be a bad idea--at least they won't have a closed mind.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why should someone be paid the same for teaching 10 students as some are paid fr 25? Also, wondering what the former account in the BOE office may have had to do with the money crisis? She was removed from her job in a very secretive way....some insurances lapsed for non-payment during her employment this past summer. Several employees rec'd cancellation notices. SOMETHING is fishy in the BOE office!!!!

    ReplyDelete