Sunday, November 18, 2012

School Consolidation Plan Remains Unconvincing

A review of the recent information released by Webster County Superintendent Martha Dean provides more information about her consolidation plan, but still fails to address several issues, including at least one key financial issue.

In the "School Closure and Reorganization Documentation" required to be released by State Board of Education policies, the report states that closing the Diana Elementary School will save the County Board of Education an average of $694,011.00 per year. The question yet to be answered is how much of a deficit is the Board currently operating under that requires that amount of savings. 

The documentation also fails to answer whether all other cost cutting steps have been taken short of closing the Diana school.  The Commentator does not doubt that the Board is in a financial pinch; we, along with other concerned citizens, just want to see the financial numbers that prove that, if at all.

As justification for the Diana closure, the Superintendent's documentation states:  "The number of students per se is not the controlling factor in recommending closure. It is the fact that students are, for the most part, served in classrooms with two grade levels and one teacher, which is not a desirable configuration, and Webster Springs Elementary School, which has adequate space to accommodate the students from [Diana], is only located 9 miles away."

Again, the justification presented does not appear to be financially based if the Superintendent believes that the current setup at Diana is somehow detrimental to the students. Where are the facts about test scores and how well the Diana students are performing?  If the undesirable "configuration" is the main justification for closing the Diana school, then the Superintendent should be required to show with facts how the students have been negatively impacted by that "configuration."  Without citing any facts to support the following statement, the documentation states that closing Diana "will enable the provision of a better educational program ... without the expenses of teachers to teach very small classes in some schools and other schools to have to have over-crowded classrooms."

The documentation also addresses the ability of the Webster Springs Elementary School (WSES) to absorb the additional Diana students.  Closing Diana will required 2 additional teaches and 1 additional aide, but the number of additional students is well within the space capacity of the WSES.  The report also notes the impact will be lessened considering that the Board should give Diana students from Jumbo and Sugar Creek the option to attend the Hacker Valley Elementary School.

As to the consolidation plan's suggestion that all 7th and 8th grade students (except those from Hacker Valley) should be transferred to the high school also raises several unanswered questions.  The main justification for this part of the plan is "curriculum enrichment," which is the provision of a variety of subjects to all 7th and 8th grade students in one place that is not currently available to such students at the other schools.

Again, where are the studies that show that the affected 7th and 8th grade students have been negatively affected by the alleged current lack of curriculum enrichment? And what impact will these 7th and 8th graders have when placed with the older high school students? Even the Superintendent apparently realizes that having the younger students at the high school is not entirely desirable; otherwise, why would she suggest having a separate, isolated wing at the high school for those younger students?

After the release of several documents by the Superintendent at the past two Board meetings, the proponents of the consolidation plan have yet to convince a lot of folks that the plan is necessary either financially or for other reasons.

12 comments:

  1. a childs education is far more important than any dollar bill....there are many other ways to cut costs in this county.what is this women thinking?i somehow believe it would only benefit her or her cliques best intrests...not the childrens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a Board employee, I can say that cuts have been made in every area possible. Some positions that the public feels are unnecessary are required by law. Mrs Dean has the best interest of the children at heart. She was given a terrible situation when she was hired-many things should have been done differently several years ago and weren't, so the she was left to fix it. I don't think the parents of this county want the State to come in and take over. Talk with other counties who have been through it-it's worse than anything that been suggested by the Superintendent.

      Delete
    2. I neglected to mention that the 7th and 8th grade students will not be interacting with the high school students. They will be in their own wing and will not be with the older students at all during the day-only on the bus, which they do now.

      Delete
    3. A child's education is def most important than money, but when that money is GONE, something has to be done.

      Delete
  2. after whos approval?

    ReplyDelete
  3. First place to start saving money for our kids education, is Martha Dean's salary. No one is worth what they are paying her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. N she should have to move to the county she is workin in this school system kids may have to make changes n parents to so she should n teachers pay is gonna b cut so she should have a cut to...law needs to b passed if u r gonna feel those shoes then u should live here...but no her pay is keepin on commin cut it n watch her complain...

      Delete
  4. U have to have a teaching degree to b in marthas shoes n shes just a sub cause Aj left.One of the teachers that may loose there jobs should try for her position...AJ COME BACK...shes tryin to fix something thats not broken.She needs to staybin braxton nnif shes trying to change people lives then by all means she should have to change hers and move to the county she is superintendent in..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She is trying to fix the mistakes that AJ made. Cuts should have been made when he was here, but he didn't make them. Now we are faced with MAJOR issues.

      Delete
    2. What a bunch of lies....she herself knows these kids need to b seperated from older kids is why shes trying to seperate them at the high school but yet there seperated now in a different building all together so makes no sence to just move them...just leave it the way it is or go back to putting the glade 7th n 8th back to the way it always was before steve came n the school was divided cause it was all one school n it was junior high not middle school included with 5th n 6th..let it go back the way it was n AJ never did no such wrong doing at all thats a bunch of bull..n yes the kids will b near higher n older kids they eat in same place they will have same buses they will have same gym...lies all lies..nice try not buying it..

      Delete
  5. AJ and the ol' buddy system is what's wrong here now. Prime example is the lighting at the football field. Instead of going about it the right way they got a "steal" on a bunch of used lights that couldn't even be used without rewiring the whole place...then the field was going to be condemned because the old lights were falling down before they could be replaced...what happened to the insurance money on that? No one knows...

    ReplyDelete